Geetanjali aman constructions case
WebIndian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law WebJun 19, 2024 · The interpretation of the term “OR” in Sub-section 2(a) of section 3 has been analysed in the case of M/s Geetanjali Aman Construction & Ors v.Hrishikesh Ramesh Paranjpe & Ors.The primary question, in this case, was whether their project, which was less than 500 square metres but consisted of more than eight flats needed to be registered?
Geetanjali aman constructions case
Did you know?
WebSep 16, 2024 · The case in concern is that of a developer Geetanjali Aman Construction who had appealed to the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal against an ordered … WebApr 11, 2024 · Ascribing to View 2, the majority of members of the MahaREAT in the case of Messrs Geetanjali Aman Constructions v. Hrishikesh Ramesh Paranjpe by their order …
WebGeetanjali Aman Constructions and ors. ...Respondents. Ms Pooja Joshi for the Applicants. Mr. Girish R. Agrawal for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2. CORAM : N.R. … WebJul 17, 2024 · Get free access to the complete judgment in M/s Geetanjali Aman Constructions v. Hrishikesh Ramesh ParanjPe on CaseMine.
Webthe case was argued by the Advocate for promoter/respondent on the point of registration. At the time of the commencement of the RERA Act, this project was on going ... Mumbai in the matter of '6M/s Geetanjali Aman Constructions and anr. v/s Hrishikesh Ramesh Paranjape and ors", "Appeal no. in SCIO()00672 in WebJul 17, 2024 · M/s Geetanjali Aman Constructions v. Hrishikesh Ramesh ParanjPe RERA Judgment Law CaseMine CITATION CODES citation codes CASE NO. SCl0000672 and SCl0000691 ATTORNEY (S) ACTS Clause (a) of Section 3 (2) of the Real Estate Regulations and Development Act, 2016 (for short, 'the Act). Section 3 (2) (a) of …
WebApr 11, 2024 · Geetanjali Aman Constructions v. Hrishikesh Ramesh Paranjpe, the GoaRERA vide a notification dated January 27, 2024 titled ‘Standard Operating …
WebJul 25, 2024 · Geetanjali Aman Construction Vs Hrishikesh Ramesh Paranjape. The bone of contention for the present case is with regards to the interpretation of Section 3 (2) of … kennebec valley ymca swim teamWebJun 14, 2024 · IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2024 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR.ABHAY S. OKA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR WRIT PETITION NO.50908 OF 2024 (LB-BMP-PIL) BETWEEN: M/s JANA JAGRITI … kennebec veterinary clinicWebSep 30, 2024 · Geetanjali Aman Construction Vs Hrishikesh Ramesh Paranjape . The bone of contention for the present case is with regards to the interpretation of Section 3(2) of the RERA Act. The provision deals with the registration of estate and what would be considered as the qualifying conditions. kennebec wealth.comWebHC insists single-member benches have no jurisdiction even in case of a Judicial member, according to provisions of the RERA. ... The order by the three-member bench exempted the developer Geetanjali Aman Constructions from registering the project with MahaRERA and also set aside the Rs 30 lakh penalty imposed on the firm. kennebec weatherhttp://icmai.asquareinfotech.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/4.2_RERA_LECTURE_SERIES_-_LANDMARK_CASES.pptx kennebec wharfWeb14 in the case of M essrs Geetanjali Aman Constructions v. Hrishikesh Ramesh Paranjpe15 by their order dated July 10, 2024, emphasised on the word “ or” between the 2 (two) conditions provided in Section 3(2)(a) of RERA, and clarified that in the event any one of the conditions is satisfied then the real estate project is kennebec youth lacrosseWebAug 31, 2024 · This was upheld in the case of Geetanjali Aman Construction v. Hrishikesh Ramesh Paranjpe where two homebuyers complained that the developer had not registered the ongoing project with RERA, the construction company filed a petition with the MahaRERA Appellate Tribunal to challenge the decisions made by RERA. According … kennebec whitewater rafting maine